In the Media

Joshua A. Tucker talks about the difference between Russian and western media coverage of the war.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about efforts to block Russian propaganda on social media.

Joshua A. Tucker analyzes how encrypted apps both help spread and stop disinformation.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about measures social media platforms are taking to stop Russian propaganda.

Joshua A. Tucker discusses a CSMaP paper on the efficacy of crowd-sourced fact checking.

Coverage of our recent paper on Russia's use of bots to respond to opposition activities.

Joshua A. Tucker discusses the future of Trump's new social media platform.

Joshua A. Tucker joins a new podcast to discuss whether there is a deep fundamental divide within our country.

Jonathan Nagler discusses social media's impact on democracy, the fallout of the Facebook Papers, and explains why Americans are awful at identifying fake news.

Megan A. Brown discusses recent research about spikes in gender-based online violence after prominent media attacks.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about the challenges that Trump’s app faces.

Megan A. Brown talks about the effects of deplatforming political figures online.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about political sectarianism and how it makes it difficult for people to dispel misinformation because they become impervious to facts.

Joshua A. Tucker explains why 'finstas' aren't a good way to create policy.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about TikTok's algorithm in comparison to Facebook and Twitter.

A CSMaP study found that "politely phrased" warnings can go a long way toward shaming people into better behavior on platforms like Twitter.

A CSMaP study found that warning Twitter users that someone they follow had been suspended -- and that they could also face suspension -- cut down on the amount of hate speech.

A CSMaP study found that giving Twitter users "suspension warnings" seriously reduced the amount of hate speech that the users used on the platform.

A CSMaP study found that users who received suspension warnings generally declined their racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise prohibited language on the platform by 10 percent.

A CSMaP study found that personalized warnings alerting Twitter users to the consequences of their behavior, reduced the amount of tweets with hateful language.

A CSMaP study tested different ways to limit hate speech on platforms like Twitter, and found that just sending users suspension warnings about their behavior, greatly limited the amount of hate speech from those accounts.

Joshua A. Tucker discusses how a void of information can help lead to misinformation.

Joshua A. Tucker talks about Twitter's new approach to fact-checking and whether research backs up its effectiveness.

A CSMaP study found that lawmakers whose tweets cause the most outrage online, received the most amount of interactions with their tweets by other users -- mostly in the form of "dunking".

Zeve Sanderson talks about how quickly the media environment norms and standards change. He also discusses the new possibilities tech companies have with the metaverse.