Facebook

Academic Research

  • Journal Article

    How deceptive online networks reached millions in the US 2020 elections

    • Ruth E. Appel, 
    • Young Mie Kim, 
    • Jennifer Pan, 
    • Yiqing Xu, 
    • Ben Nimmo, 
    • Daniel Robert Thomas, 
    • Hunt Allcott, 
    • Pablo Barberá
    • Taylor Brown, 
    • Adriana Crespo-Tenorio, 
    • Drew Dimmery, 
    • Deen Freelon, 
    • Matthew Gentzkow, 
    • Sandra González-Bailón
    • Andrew M. Guess
    • Shanto Iyengar, 
    • David Lazer, 
    • Neil Malhotra, 
    • Devra Moehler, 
    • Brendan Nyhan, 
    • Jaime Settle, 
    • Emily Thorson, 
    • Rebekah Tromble, 
    • Caros Velasco Rivera, 
    • Arjun Wilkins, 
    • Magdalena Wojcieszak
    • Beixian Xiong, 
    • Chad Kiewiet de Jonge, 
    • Annie Franco, 
    • Winter Mason, 
    • Natalie Jomini Stroud, 
    • Joshua A. Tucker

    Nature Human Behaviour (2026)

    View Article View abstract

    Deceptive online networks are coordinated efforts that use identity deception to pursue strategic political or financial goals. During the US 2020 elections, these networks reached at least 37 million Facebook and 3 million Instagram users, representing 15% and 2% of the platforms’ active US adult users, respectively. Only 3 networks out of 49—1 network with explicitly political aims and 2 that appeared to use politics as a lure for profit—were responsible for over 70% of users reached. Notably, accounts unaffiliated with the networks played an important role in facilitating this reach by resharing content the three networks produced. Deceptive networks, regardless of whether their goals were political or financial, reached users who were older, more conservative, more frequently exposed to content from untrustworthy sources, and spent more time on Facebook.

  • Working Paper

    The Effect of Deactivating Facebook and Instagram on Users’ Emotional State

    • Hunt Allcott, 
    • Matthew Gentzkow, 
    • Benjamin Wittenbrink, 
    • Juan Carlos Cisneros, 
    • Adriana Crespo-Tenorio, 
    • Drew Dimmery, 
    • Deen Freelon, 
    • Sandra González-Bailón
    • Andrew M. Guess
    • Young Mie Kim, 
    • David Lazer, 
    • Neil Malhotra, 
    • Devra Moehler, 
    • Sameer Nair-Desai, 
    • Brendan Nyhan, 
    • Jennifer Pan, 
    • Jaime Settle, 
    • Emily Thorson, 
    • Rebekah Tromble, 
    • Carlos Velasco Rivera, 
    • Arjun Wilkins, 
    • Magdalena Wojcieszak
    • Annie Franco, 
    • Chad Kiewiet de Jonge, 
    • Winter Mason, 
    • Natalie Jomini Stroud, 
    • Joshua A. Tucker

    Working Paper, April 2025

    View Article View abstract

    We estimate the effect of social media deactivation on users’ emotional state in two large randomized experiments before the 2020 U.S. election. People who deactivated Facebook for the six weeks before the election reported a 0.060 standard deviation improvement in an index of happiness, depression, and anxiety, relative to controls who deactivated for just the first of those six weeks. People who deactivated Instagram for those six weeks reported a 0.041 standard deviation improvement relative to controls. Exploratory analysis suggests the Facebook effect is driven by people over 35, while the Instagram effect is driven by women under 25.

View All Related Research

Reports & Analysis

View All Related Reports & Analysis

News & Commentary

View All Related News